OPINION: The Usurping Of The Majority

It was reading David Kurten’s statement that broke me. I was trying to be objective and see the positive side of this story but to say I was struggling was an understatement. I couldn’t think of a positive angle to take and I still cant – the statement is dignified, respectful and just plain nice. The facts in Mr Kurtens statement are the incontrovertible truth. He was promised the position of Deputy Leader. The video is out there and it exists. I should know. I spent a whole evening spooling through videos of the hustings in question to defend on Facebook the story as it appeared on Kipper Central. This promise has now been broken in what I believe to be a grievous error of judgment made by Henry Bolton. Trust is a scarce commodity for any politician and it has now been thoughtlessly and needlessly squandered.

However, there is a wider point which adds insult to the injury. It is my belief that the leadership election results showed a clearly socially conservative majority among those who voted. Of course, Mr Kurtens 2,000+ votes are in that mix as were a substantial proportion of the votes cast for John Rees-Evans and Anne Marie Waters. The most overtly socially liberal platform put forward was by UKIP United and they scraped a mere 600 odd votes. Indeed, many of Mr Bolton’s own votes were cast for him on the explicit understanding that Mr Kurten would be Deputy, had Henry been honest and stated that he was not going to appoint Mr Kurten then his number of votes would be reduced. I am not saying it would have been by enough to lose to Ms Waters but it certainly would have been reduced. So, to add to the affront to common decency, the sense that loyalty should be rewarded, we have another, deeper insult to democracy.

I understand that Mr Bolton has his reasons but those reasons from what can be heard on the grapevine basically amount to a capitulation to the extremist behaviour of the LGBT In UKIP group. This group is a minority and in a democracy, a minority should yes, have their rights protected but those rights do not include the right to usurp the settled will of the majority and as I have just demonstrated that is the core of what has happened here. The minority has been allowed to hold a gun to the head of the leadership and instead of a Deputy Leader who represents the settled will of the majority we have a Deputy Leader who looks suspiciously like a social liberal. I will give Margot Parker the benefit of the doubt, for now, and indeed the treatment of Mr Kurten can scarcely be said to be her fault even if she is the immediate beneficiary of its consequences.  Maybe she will step-up and give the newly disenfranchised a voice at the top table. I hope so and I hope the above assumption is proved wrong.

However, this is all spilled milk now. What of the future? Mr Kurten himself has stated he intends to start a “new venture” to “rally the forces of conservatism” This sounds to me like a new movement, not a new Party. Good. I look down the leadership list and while it is a conservative list, with little radical change, I look in vain for a serious voice of social conservatism. No doubt this is why Breitbart vented its spleen all over the leadership damming Mr Bolton’s choice of “establishment allies”. Democratically speaking social conservatives are morally entitled to representation at the top table but we have none. It is not just Mr Kurten who was disenfranchised but every single social conservative within UKIP.  So, let me be the first to suggest this solution. If we are to be excluded from the appointed leadership then let us fight the democratic fight. NEC elections are imminent and it is my sincere belief that Mr Kurten should put himself forward as a candidate for the NEC and were he to so do it is my belief that he would win that election and give us, the majority, a voice at the highest level of the Party. We cannot allow this Party to be held hostage by a terroristic, and in the words of others extremist, minority within the Party and must recognise that the majority has the right to democratically assert itself. It did in the leadership election and Mr Bolton was the beneficiary, however, this time, it will, hopefully, right a serious wrong that he has done against Mr Kurten and indeed many of his own supporters.
Author: Darrell Goodliffe Kipper Central

Northern Ireland Politics 2017 – UKIP Conference Speech

 

Since the election on the 7th March this year the NI Assembly has met for 46 mins and to date it has cost the taxpayer, yes that’s you and I, £6 million to cover MLAs’ salaries and expenses. No provision has been made for an non-operative Assembly. In fact this week the Independent Financial Review Panel determined that they should receive an additional £500 now and a similar increase in 6 months time. Money well spent I hear you cry. If we had the equivalent in my Nottinghamshire County, NI would be governed by 80 County Councillors on approx £20k including expenses.

 

Meanwhile, there are cuts in care packages, waiting lists for hospital appointments are getting longer and Mental Health funding is curtailed. Road safety has always been a major issue in NI. Did you know that more people were killed due to road accidents than during the horrific unrest during the Troubles?

 

Excessive speed on rural roads, an investment in road expansions is urgently needed and potholes abound. A common phrase you can hear is; We used to drive on the left of the road. Now we drive on what is left of the road.

Over 25% are employed in the public sector, the highest region throughout the UK and young people not in Education, Employment or Training sits at approx. 20%. Job losses are announced far too frequently and this week the manufacturing sector in East Belfast has been dealt a significant blow.

 

The names of the Parties may be different but many people vote not for a party, but to ensure that the “other side” don’t get elected. It’s politics of fear and in the NI case it’s largely down to tribal voting patterns on constitutional matters. That’s why I joined UKIP in NI. It offered a non-sectarian Unionist alternative with a UK National party who believe that Direct Democracy through Referendums should resolve issues when politicians cannot agree.

 

The latest stumbling block preventing a return to the Assembly is the demand from Sein Fein for a standalone Irish Language Act.

The Irish language received official recognition and funding under the 1998 Good Friday Agreement and for 20 years in Government SF seemed content to channel their efforts through the Irish medium education sector. There certainly hasn’t been desire to legislate for a bilingual public sector with preferential recruitment of Irish speakers. According to the 2011 census, only 4,045 people claimed Irish as their main language.

 

Language should threaten no one – however when language is used as a cultural weapon by political republicanism it clearly becomes a threat to British identity. Stormont has invested £171m in the past five years to promote the Irish language. However, SF has driven more people away from ever cultivating a genuine interest in the Irish language than any of these publicly funded incentives can ever hope to attract. Any legislation, no matter what it’s called or how its packaged, which underpins the Irish language in a legal framework will have massive implications for local government, the courts, the civil service, schools and everyday life in Northern Ireland. Legislative intervention will be used as an employment driver for Irish speakers and will open-up the potential for endless legal challenges on a range of related issues.

 

The parochial Unionist Parties wish to promote Ulster Scots and Nationalists advocate the Irish language. Maybe it’s time to discover the common language spoken throughout the North of Ireland for centuries, Ulster Gaelic. NI politicians should be focussing on that which should unite society – the need to tackle waiting-lists, the crisis in school budgets, and the need to create new and better jobs

BREXIT BORDER

 

On 23rd June 2016 the electorate in the United Kingdom of GB and NI voted to leave the EU together. We are united on this matter. No ifs, No buts, No fudge. Leave means Leave. Northern Ireland is not for sale to remain in the Single Market and Customs Union as proposed by the EU. This crazy idea breaches the Belfast Agreement. Northern Ireland is British. Carving up the UK is not on the agenda, not an inch.

 

Relations between Ireland and the UK have never been better. Ties of language, family, free trade and free travel bind us together. We regard the Irish as our “Kith and Kin”. All of these ties precede the formation of the EU. Irish farmers and small businesses export €1 billion with the UK every week. So you can see that it’s mutually beneficial for this situation to continue. Following the 2009-12 boom and bust in Ireland’s economy it was the UK who rose to the occasion with an offer of an interest free loan. The EU’s response, a € 64 billion Franco – German bank debt imposed on the Irish taxpayer.

 

100 years on from Ireland’s Independence we voted to regain our Independence because we want to make our own laws, spend our own money, act in our interest and determine our own destiny. With Brexit, Ireland has an even greater financial incentive to leave the EU and agree a free trade agreement with the UK. What we are witnessing is the EU’s provocation by interfering in our good relations, fanning the flames of political violence over the Border issue. A recent EU commission ruling on Ireland’s corporation taxation rate has also come as a shock leaving multi-nationals watching Apple Computer’s appeal very closely on the billions the EU says it owes the Irish Government.  But we all know that the EU isn’t about freedom, it’s about enslavement of nations and peoples. You cannot be a sovereign, independent self-governing country while being a member of the EU. To paraphrase Patrick Pearce, “Ireland unfree from the EU shall never be at peace”. Is it now time for the people of Ireland to demand a Referendum to determine whether they want to remain a member of the political EU or be granted Special Status within the EU? Let’s hope commonsense prevails and that our good relationship will continue to flourish and maybe the people of Ireland will join us one day as members of the Commonwealth.

 

Signal Centre – Digital Masterclass

Date 1: Wednesday 4 October, 8.00am–10.30am 
Date 2: 
Wednesday 18 October, 8.00am–10.30am 
Date 3: 
Wednesday 1 November, 8.00am-10.30am
Venue: The Marine Court Hotel, Bangor
Cost: 
£45 (for the series)
Due to popular demand we are delighted to host, for the first time, the Digital Seminar Series. Three Masterclass events will be held over three sessions on current Digital themes.
During each themed event you will hear a panel discussion and a live pitch from leading experts on a variety of business related digital topics, and then you select which speaker/topic to join for their Masterclass session.

http://www.signalni.com/Events/The-Digital-Seminar-Series—3-Workshops/Masterclass—The-Digital-Seminar-Series.aspx

Why UKIP must take the lead in shaming Google

Some of you may have noticed a news item yesterday about a Google employee – a Harvard-educated software engineer named James D’Amore – who has been fired for publishing a 10-page memo questioning the company’s diversity policies (link below). 

D’Amore’s sin was not, according to the company, expressing a view. It was not being anti-diversity: he makes clear in the memo that he is pro diversity and wants to see it done more effectively. His sin was to use as evidence the idea that men and women have different traits. 

He describes these traits in ways which make clear the positives about women and the negatives about men – perhaps even in a rather biased way (biased towards women). 

But the very fact that he has suggested that the disparity in representation of women and men in software engineering may be something to do with the differences between men and women, got him fired. 

To paraphrase Google CEO Sunder Pichai’s take on Voltaire: ‘I disapprove what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it. You’re fired.’ 

In fact, the whole thrust of D’Amore’s thesis was that it was a political bias to the left and against conservatism within Google that was the problem, and was making people with divergent views feel ‘unsafe’ within the company. Google fired him for saying it, apparently having no sense of irony whatsoever. 

Read the memo here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf

I think you will agree with me that any organisation that can fire a man for writing this – and whose mission is to obtain, organise, control and sell ‘the world’s information’ – represents exactly the chilling, illiberal, authoritarian oppression that we were founded to oppose.

Voltaire also said: ‘Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities’.

I believe that every UKIP member should boycott Google, and encourage everyone else they know to do the same. There is evil abroad, masquerading as virtue. We must fight it.

TORY GOVERNMENT’S ‘DARK AGE’ AUSTERITY POLICIES ARE BADLY HURTING BRITISH WOMEN

A new study by the Institute of Fiscal Studies proves that UKIP were right to ‘stand alone’ in resisting delays to state pension for women.

Andrew Charalambous, UKIP’s Work and Pensions Spokesman claimed “The effect of cutting £74 a week from household benefits has been to make older women poorer and to significantly increase the likelihood British pensioners will find themselves trapped in poverty. We cannot stand by while so many British pensioners, who worked hard to build the British economy, will have to choose again in a few months time between heating and eating”.

The IFS has demonstrated that absolute poverty rates fir British women aged between 60 and 62 had soared from 15 to 21%. Reforms to state pension are saving the Treasury £4.2bn a year but leaving a million more women with £50 a week less in their purse.

Charalambous went on to say “Tory blind austerity has failed Britain. 7.6 million women will lose nearly £10,000 each yet public sector debt is still standing tall at £1.75trn. UKIP appear to be the only party fighting to stop our country becoming a nation where only the very wealthy can afford to retire.”